Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
D

Failure to Provide Timely Incontinence Care and Document Refusals

Albert Lea, Minnesota Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident with severely impaired cognition, dementia, and epilepsy, who was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. The resident's care plan required staff to check and change incontinence products every shift and as needed, maintain consistency in ADL routines, and re-approach the resident if care was refused, documenting each refusal. Despite these interventions, continuous observation revealed that the resident remained in urine-soaked sheets for an extended period, with a strong odor of urine present in the room, and staff did not offer toileting or change the resident's clothing or bedding during multiple interactions over several hours. Documentation in the facility's electronic health record indicated that the resident had only been toileted three times during the day in question, with no record of toileting or incontinence care for approximately eight hours. Staff interviews confirmed that the expectation was to offer toileting and check/change incontinence products every two hours, even if the resident refused, and to document each refusal. However, staff failed to follow these protocols, as evidenced by the lack of documented offers and the resident remaining in soiled conditions for an extended period. Family and staff interviews further corroborated that the resident would not have wanted to remain in urine-soaked clothing or bedding, and that staff were aware of the need to re-approach and document refusals. The facility's policy required necessary services for residents unable to perform ADLs, including maintaining personal hygiene. The observed failure to provide timely incontinence care and to document care refusals as required led to the identified deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙