Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Multiple Residents

Duluth, Minnesota Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for three residents, resulting in assessments that did not reflect the residents' actual status at the time of completion. For one resident, the admission MDS was incorrectly coded to indicate the resident was not receiving hospice services, despite census documentation and the care plan confirming hospice care at admission. Both the RN and DON acknowledged that the MDS should have reflected hospice services. Another resident's quarterly MDS was marked as having a colostomy in Section H, but interviews with nursing staff confirmed the resident did not have a colostomy, and the MDS nurse admitted this was an error. A third resident's quarterly MDS indicated no use of mobility devices, despite the resident having a history of lower limb amputation and being observed with a wheelchair and prosthetic leg in the room. The resident confirmed using these devices when out of bed, and the MDS coordinator acknowledged the MDS was inaccurate. The DON confirmed the expectation that MDS reports should accurately reflect the resident's status and that the MDS in question was not accurate regarding mobility devices. These findings were based on record review, staff interviews, and direct observation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙