Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
G

Failure to Ensure Resident Freedom from Physical Restraints

St Joseph, Michigan Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

Fine: $186,44029 days payment denial
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and edema was subjected to the use of a geri-chair with a lap tray, which functioned as a physical restraint. The resident had previously been hospitalized and returned to the facility with decreased trunk control, leading to the initial use of the geri-chair for support. However, subsequent assessments and staff interviews indicated that the resident had regained strength and could sit unsupported, yet the use of the geri-chair and lap tray continued. Observations and interviews revealed that the lap tray and positioning of the geri-chair restricted the resident's mobility, preventing her from standing or moving independently. Multiple staff members, including CNAs and the DON, acknowledged that the resident was unable to remove the tray herself and frequently expressed distress, agitation, and frustration while restrained. Documentation in nursing progress notes and behavior logs showed repeated episodes of the resident banging on the tray, yelling, and attempting to get out of the chair, indicating ongoing emotional and physical discomfort. Despite the resident's improved physical condition and clear behavioral signs of distress, the facility continued to use the geri-chair and lap tray, primarily to reduce falls and for staff convenience, rather than for a current medical necessity. The facility's own restraint policy prohibits the use of physical restraints for convenience and requires reassessment with any significant change in condition. The required reassessment and communication with the hospice care coordinator regarding the resident's improved status and negative response to the restraint did not occur, resulting in the continued inappropriate use of a physical restraint.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙