Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0842
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Health Care Proxy Activation

Fall River, Massachusetts Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one resident by not correctly documenting the activation status of the resident's health care proxy (HCP). The resident, who was admitted with diagnoses including left calf hematoma evacuation, wound debridement, and atrial fibrillation, was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of eight out of 15. The facility's records, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS), physician's orders, and care plan, indicated that the resident's HCP was activated. However, review of the outside hospital's discharge summary showed that while the resident had signed advanced directives and a HCP document, there was no indication that the HCP had been invoked at the hospital. Further review of physician and nurse practitioner progress notes consistently documented that the HCP was not activated. During an interview, a unit manager acknowledged that the order indicating HCP activation may have been entered in error. This inconsistency in documentation resulted in the resident's medical record failing to accurately reflect the true status of the HCP activation, contrary to the facility's policy and accepted professional standards.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙