Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0645
D

Failure to Complete Required PASARR Re-Evaluations and Referrals

Silver Spring, Maryland Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Facility staff failed to ensure that required PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screenings were re-evaluated and completed as mandated for residents with indications of mental disorder or intellectual disability. For three residents reviewed, the initial Level I PASARR screens indicated the need for further evaluation (Level II PASARR) or re-screening if the stay extended beyond 30 days. However, there was no evidence in the clinical records that these follow-up screenings or referrals to the appropriate agencies were completed within the required 40-day timeframe. The deficiency was identified through medical record reviews and staff interviews, which confirmed the absence of updated PASARR documentation and necessary Level II evaluations. Specifically, one resident had a Level I PASARR screen indicating the need for a Level II evaluation, but no such evaluation was found in the records. Another resident's PASARR form also indicated the need for re-evaluation and referral, but again, no evidence of a Level II screen was present. For a third resident, the PASARR Level I form responses required a Level II evaluation, but staff acknowledged that this was not completed. These findings were corroborated by interviews with the Director of Social Services and the DON, who confirmed the lack of required follow-up PASARR documentation and evaluations.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙