Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
D

Failure to Prevent Resident Elopement Due to Inadequate Supervision

Marshalltown, Iowa Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of a resident with severe cognitive impairment. The resident, who had a BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment, required substantial to maximum assistance with transfers and ambulation, and had a history of elopement and exit-seeking behaviors. The care plan included the use of a wander guard, regular checks of the device, and staff assistance with mobility and reorientation. Despite these interventions, the resident was able to leave the facility unsupervised. On the morning of the incident, staff statements and interviews revealed that a CNA heard a door alarm and subsequently noticed the resident was missing from their room. Staff searched both inside and outside the building, and the resident was eventually found at the front door, cold and confused, wearing a wander guard that was still functional. Staff accounts indicated that the resident had attempted to leave the facility multiple times in the days prior, and another resident reported seeing the individual moving quickly down the hall earlier that morning. The nurse on duty had exited the building around the time of the incident, and the front door alarm was triggered, but the resident was not immediately located. The facility's elopement risk evaluation and care plan identified the resident as high risk for elopement, with a history of not responding to redirection and attempts to remove the wander guard. The facility's missing patient response plan outlined procedures for searching and notification, but the resident was able to exit and re-enter the building without staff immediately realizing. There were no operational cameras, and staff were unclear about certain security procedures, such as locking the sun room door, under new management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙