Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0725
D

Failure to Respond to Resident Call Lights Within Required Timeframe

Osage, Iowa Survey Completed on 04-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide timely responses to resident call lights, as evidenced by interviews with residents and staff, review of Alarm Response Report forms, and facility policy. One resident reported timing her call light and found it was not answered for over 15 minutes on multiple occasions, with documented delays ranging from 17 to 26 minutes over several days. Another resident reported her call light was left unanswered for up to two hours on an evening shift, particularly when agency staff were present, and the Alarm Response Report confirmed several instances where her call light was not answered within the required 15-minute timeframe. Staff interviews confirmed that call lights were not answered within 15 minutes due to staffing shortages and issues with agency staff refusing to respond to call lights. The facility's policy requires timely responses to call lights, but the documented delays and staff admissions indicate this standard was not met for at least two residents during the review period. The facility had a census of 28 residents at the time of the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙