Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0620
D

Delayed Completion of Admission Paperwork

New Albany, Indiana Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident's admission paperwork was completed in a timely manner. Specifically, the clinical record for a resident with diagnoses including dementia and cognitive communication deficit showed that several required admission documents, such as consent to treat, CPR consent, bed rail consent, digital photography of wounds consent, psychoactive medication consent, pharmacy enrollment agreement, COVID-19 disclosure, POST form consent, and the admission agreement, were not signed promptly upon admission. The admission agreement, in particular, was not completed within the expected 48 to 72-hour timeframe after the resident's entry to the facility. During an interview, the Admissions Coordinator acknowledged that the admission process for the resident had been problematic and that she was unaware the previous Admission Assistant had not finalized the admission agreement as required. The facility's policy stipulated that the admission agreement should be signed at the time of or soon after admission, but this was not adhered to in this case, resulting in a delay in the completion of essential admission documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙