Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0689
E

Failure to Implement Effective Fall Interventions for High-Risk Resident

Chicago Heights, Illinois Survey Completed on 04-07-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to develop and implement effective fall interventions tailored to the root cause for a resident with multiple falls. The resident, who had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, functional quadriplegia, difficulty in walking, and orthostatic hypotension, experienced six falls over a six-month period. Despite being identified as a high fall risk, the interventions added after each fall were largely repetitive and did not address the underlying causes of the falls, such as the resident's attempts to self-transfer or refusal to use the call light for assistance. Documentation revealed that after each fall, interventions such as encouraging the use of the call light, keeping the environment safe, and providing education were repeated, even though the resident continued to fall in similar circumstances. There was no evidence of new or different interventions being implemented after repeated falls of the same nature. Staff interviews confirmed that interventions were often repeated, and there was a lack of clarity among staff regarding how fall interventions were chosen or evaluated for effectiveness. Some staff were unable to recall what interventions were put in place after specific falls, and there was no documentation of reassessment or modification of interventions when falls recurred. The facility's policy required that interventions be individualized and adjusted if falls recurred, and that staff monitor and document the effectiveness of interventions. However, the report shows that the same interventions were used multiple times without documented assessment of their effectiveness or consideration of alternative strategies. The resident's continued decline and repeated falls, despite these interventions, indicate that the facility did not adequately address the root causes of the falls as required by their own policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙