Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0607
D

Failure to Timely Request Fingerprint-Based Background Checks After Criminal History 'HIT'

Chicago, Illinois Survey Completed on 04-16-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to follow its policy requiring a fingerprint-based background check to be requested within 72 hours after receiving a name-based criminal history background check with a 'HIT' result for two residents. Specifically, for both residents, the required fingerprinting consent forms were found to be unsigned and undated, and there was no documentation that the fingerprinting had been scheduled within the required timeframe. The staff responsible for scheduling the fingerprinting was unable to provide evidence of timely communication with the fingerprint service provider, and in one case, admitted to not sending the scheduling email at all. The administrator confirmed that the fingerprinting should have been scheduled within 72 hours according to facility policy, but this was not done. Both residents involved had 'HIT' results on their criminal history reports, with one resident having a conviction for prostitution (Class 4) and the other for burglary (Class 2). Both residents were documented as cognitively intact based on their BIMS scores. The facility's Identified Offender Policy and Procedure clearly states the requirement to request a fingerprint-based background check within 72 hours after a name-based check with qualifying offenses, but this process was not followed for the two residents reviewed.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙