Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0881
D

Failure to Review and Discontinue Unnecessary Antibiotic Therapy

Kellogg, Idaho Survey Completed on 05-01-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program as required, resulting in a resident continuing to receive antibiotic therapy without appropriate clinical indication. Record review showed that a resident with a history of Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) infection and sepsis was prescribed Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate with no documented stop date. Despite the resolution of the infection, the antibiotic was not discontinued, and there was no evidence that the indication for continued use was reviewed or confirmed by the facility's staff or consulting pharmacist. Interviews with the Infection Preventionist (IP) and the Pharmacist revealed that the ongoing need for the antibiotic was not reassessed after the initial prescription, and the resident was not included in subsequent antibiotic stewardship reviews. The IP acknowledged not seeking clarification from the infectious disease physician regarding the continued use of the antibiotic after the infection had resolved. The Pharmacist also agreed that the indication for the antibiotic should have been reviewed, but this was not done, contrary to the facility's policy and CDC guidelines.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙