Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0806
F

Failure to Accommodate Resident Latex Allergies in Food Service

Carrollton, Georgia Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to accommodate the food allergies, intolerances, and preferences of seven residents who had documented latex allergies. Despite these allergies being recorded in the electronic medical records at admission, dietary staff were observed plating food using latex gloves, which is a direct source of latex exposure. The dietary staff member involved stated a preference for latex gloves over vinyl or nitrile alternatives and was unaware of any residents with latex allergies. The dietary manager confirmed that staff could choose their glove type and was also unaware of the presence of residents with latex allergies. Facility policies reviewed did not specifically address latex allergies or restrict the use of latex gloves in food service. The policies generally required the use of clean barriers, such as single-use gloves or utensils, when handling food, but did not specify glove material. During interviews, the dietary manager, DON, infection control nurse, and administrator all indicated a lack of awareness regarding both the use of latex gloves in dietary services and the presence of residents with latex allergies. The DON and administrator acknowledged the risk of anaphylactic reactions in residents with latex allergies if exposed to latex products. The deficiency was identified during a tray line observation where a staff member served food to residents using latex gloves, despite the presence of multiple residents with documented latex allergies. The lack of communication and policy specificity regarding latex allergies contributed to the failure to provide appropriate alternatives and ensure resident safety during food service.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙