Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0558
D

Call Light Inaccessibility for Resident

Sylvester, Georgia Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when a resident with diagnoses including diabetes, dementia with agitation, insomnia, dizziness, anxiety, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and orthostatic hypotension was observed multiple times lying in bed without access to her call light. The call light cord was found coiled and hanging on the wall behind the head of her bed, approximately three feet away, and not within her reach. The resident, who had intact cognition and was independent with bed mobility and transfers, confirmed during an interview that she could not reach the call light and needed it to be accessible to call for help. She reported that housekeeping staff had moved the call light during cleaning and did not return it to her bed. Staff interviews revealed that the expectation was for the call light to be placed within the resident's reach, and that all staff, including housekeeping, received periodic in-service training on this requirement. However, the facility did not have a written policy addressing call light accessibility. The failure to ensure the call light was accessible for this resident was observed on several occasions, and staff acknowledged the lapse in practice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙