Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
D

Failure to Provide Privacy During Wound Care Treatments

Richmond Hill, Georgia Survey Completed on 04-13-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide full privacy to four residents during wound care treatments, as observed by surveyors. In multiple instances, staff conducted wound care procedures without ensuring that window blinds were closed and privacy curtains were fully engaged. This resulted in residents being exposed to view from outside areas such as the courtyard and parking lot, as well as to their roommates, during sensitive medical treatments. The facility's own policies require that privacy be provided during such care, including the use of privacy curtains and closed blinds. For one resident with a stage four sacral pressure ulcer, the wound care nurse performed the dressing change with the privacy curtain pulled but left the window blinds open, allowing full view from the courtyard. The nurse acknowledged during an interview that she did not think to close the blinds during the procedure. Another resident with dementia and skin breakdown had wound care performed with both the privacy curtain and window blinds open, exposing the resident to their roommate and anyone outside. The nurse completed the entire treatment without providing privacy. Additional observations included a resident with a left ankle wound who received care while sitting near a window with open blinds, in full view of the parking lot and visitors. The LPN did not close the blinds or provide other privacy measures. Similarly, another resident with osteomyelitis of the vertebra and sacral region underwent wound care with open blinds, exposing the resident to the parking lot and a resident outside. The LPN admitted during an interview that she did not think about closing the blinds during the procedure. In all cases, the Director of Nursing confirmed that the expectation was for full privacy to be provided, including closing both privacy curtains and window blinds during resident care.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙