Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Assist and Accurately Document Meal Intake for Cognitively Impaired Resident

Thomasville, Georgia Survey Completed on 05-02-2025

Penalty

Fine: $10,615
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide necessary assistance and accurate documentation of meal intake for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and a history of weight loss. The resident, who had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and malnutrition, required supervision and set-up for eating, as well as cueing and encouragement to consume meals. Observations revealed that staff frequently left the resident alone during mealtimes, did not provide adequate assistance or encouragement, and failed to reposition the meal tray for optimal access. On multiple occasions, the resident consumed little to none of the meals provided, yet staff documented inaccurately that the resident had eaten 51-75% of the meals. The resident's care plan specifically required staff to record food intake at each meal and provide assistance with ADLs as needed. Despite this, staff did not follow through with these interventions, as evidenced by direct observations and staff interviews. The documentation of meal intake did not reflect the actual consumption observed, and staff did not offer alternatives or sufficient encouragement when the resident was not eating. These failures contributed to the deficiency in maintaining the resident's nutritional status.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙