Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessment for Resident on Mechanically Altered Diet

Bainbridge, Georgia Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one resident. According to the facility's policy, residents are to receive assessments that accurately reflect their status at the time of assessment, conducted by qualified staff. For this resident, who had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, the quarterly MDS assessment indicated that the resident was not on a mechanically altered diet. However, a review of the resident's diet orders and communication forms showed that the resident had been placed on a mechanical soft, ground meat diet due to a mouth injury, and this order was still in effect at the time of the MDS assessment. Interviews with facility staff, including the Dietary Manager and Nurse Practitioner, confirmed that the resident was receiving a mechanically altered diet and had not been reassessed to change this order. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged that the MDS Section K should have indicated the use of a mechanically altered diet but was not marked accordingly. This discrepancy between the resident's actual diet and what was documented in the MDS assessment resulted in an inaccurate assessment for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙