Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0677
E

Failure to Provide Facial Grooming Assistance for Dependent Residents

Winter Haven, Florida Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide adequate grooming assistance, specifically shaving facial hair, for four residents who required help with activities of daily living (ADL). Observations revealed that these residents had visible facial hair, such as white or gray patches on their chins, despite documentation indicating that ADL care was provided and no refusals of care were recorded. Interviews with the affected residents and their representatives confirmed that the presence of facial hair was undesirable and that assistance was expected but not provided. Review of care plans for these residents showed that they required varying levels of assistance with personal hygiene, ranging from supervision to total dependence. None of the care plans documented any behaviors or refusals related to personal grooming, and staff interviews indicated that facial grooming should be part of daily ADL care for both male and female residents. Staff members, including CNAs and LPNs, stated that female residents should not have facial hair and that grooming was expected to be completed during morning care and on bath/shower days. The facility's policy on grooming facial hair outlined specific procedures for assisting residents with shaving to maintain proper hygiene. However, despite these policies and staff expectations, the observed residents continued to have facial hair, and there was no documentation of refusal or behavioral issues that would have prevented grooming. This indicates a failure to follow through with the required assistance for personal grooming as outlined in the residents' care plans and facility policy.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙