Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0686
D

Failure to Provide Adequate Pressure Ulcer Care and Prevention

Fort Myers, Florida Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with multiple comorbidities, including end stage renal disease, diabetes, cognitive impairment, and immobility, was admitted to the facility with a high risk for skin breakdown and existing pressure wounds. Initial assessments did not identify wounds on the coccyx or right flank, and the admission MDS did not document the presence of stage 3 or unstageable pressure injuries, nor did it include interventions such as pressure-reducing devices, a turning/repositioning program, or nutrition/hydration measures. However, within days, new wounds were identified, including a stage 2 wound on the right rear flank and a stage 3 wound on the coccyx, which were not present or documented at admission. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was not consistently turned or repositioned, especially while in bed or in a wheelchair, despite being at high risk for pressure injuries. Staff, including CNAs and therapy personnel, expressed a belief that offloading cushions alone were sufficient and that repositioning was not necessary when such devices were used. There was no scheduled turning or repositioning program in place, and the care plan only included general interventions such as turning and repositioning as needed. The resident was observed sitting on an obstructed offloading cushion and without offloading support for the right flank wound, and staff confirmed that no specific offloading or repositioning was provided for that area. Further, wound assessments were inconsistent and not promptly communicated to clinical leadership or the physician. The presence of black tissue in the right flank wound, indicating an unstageable wound, was not documented as a significant change in condition, and neither the physician nor the physician's assistant were made aware of this development. The wound team had not seen the wound for at least a week, and there was a lack of clear communication and documentation regarding the resident's wound status and necessary interventions.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙