Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Ensure Timely Pharmacist Review and Documentation of Medication Irregularities

Naples, Florida Survey Completed on 04-24-2025

Penalty

Fine: $16,150
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that the consultant pharmacist consistently reported the results of monthly drug regimen reviews and that identified medication irregularities were properly addressed with documented physician rationale. For one resident, the consultant pharmacist's recommendations regarding the use of pantoprazole and zolpidem were disagreed with by the physician, but there was no documentation in the medical record providing a rationale for these decisions, as required by facility policy. The consultant pharmacist indicated that such rationales might be found in progress notes, but a review of the record did not reveal any such documentation. Additionally, the facility did not have evidence of a completed monthly medication regimen review for another resident for a specific month. The consultant pharmacist stated that the review was visible on her computer, but due to a system glitch, she was unable to provide a printed or electronic copy with the resident's name. The Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no documentation of the review in the facility or in the resident's electronic health record for that month. Interviews with facility staff, including the consultant pharmacist and nurse practitioner, revealed inconsistencies in understanding and documenting the requirements for medication regimen reviews and the handling of pharmacy recommendations, particularly regarding the need for stop dates and rationales for continued or PRN psychotropic medication orders. These lapses resulted in noncompliance with the facility's own policies and federal requirements for medication management and documentation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙