Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Collaborate with Hospice on Code Status Documentation

West Palm Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency occurred when the facility failed to ensure proper collaboration with Hospice services regarding a resident's code status, resulting in contradictory documentation. The resident, who was cognitively impaired and had a terminal diagnosis, was admitted to Hospice services with a documented DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order in the Hospice paperwork. However, the facility's electronic medical record (EMR) and care plan listed the resident as a full code, and current orders reflected this status as well. Discontinued orders and Hospice documentation indicated a DNR status, but this was not consistently reflected in the facility's records. Interviews with facility staff revealed a lack of awareness and communication regarding the resident's correct code status. The RN relied on the EMR banner for code status information and was unaware of the DNR order in the Hospice paperwork. The Unit Manager and DON were also unaware that the DNR order had been provided by Hospice and could not recall or explain changes made to the code status in the EMR. There was no documentation of communication with the Hospice provider or the resident's representative regarding the code status, and staff could not provide a clear process for updating code status upon changes in care, such as admission to Hospice.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙