Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0561
D

Failure to Support Resident Communication Preferences

West Palm Beach, Florida Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to honor a resident's right to self-determination by not supporting the resident's choice to have a sign displaying personal preferences, dislikes, and family contact information posted in the resident's room. The resident, who was Spanish-speaking and assessed as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 13, relied on the sign for communication due to a language barrier and limited English proficiency. The sign, created by the resident's family, was observed over the resident's bed but was later removed by an unknown individual. The resident and his spouse, both with limited English skills, expressed distress over the removal, stating that the sign was essential for communicating needs to staff. Interviews with facility staff, including the Social Services Director, DON, and Administrator, revealed that none of them knew who removed the sign or why it was taken down. The resident reported that the sign was not removed by direct care staff, but could not identify the person responsible. The care plan for the resident included interventions to address communication barriers, such as providing a translator and evaluating alternative communication methods, but did not address the removal of the sign. The lack of communication and failure to support the resident's expressed preference led to the deficiency.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙