Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0756
D

Failure to Ensure Proper Drug Regimen Review and Documentation

Fort Pierce, Florida Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure appropriate drug regimen reviews for two residents. For one resident, the pharmacy recommended a specific tapering schedule for a nicotine patch, including a six-week period on a 14 mg dose before tapering to 7 mg, with clear stop dates. However, the resident was switched from 14 mg to 7 mg after only five days, rather than the recommended six weeks. The resident was not informed of this change, and the B-Unit Manager confirmed that nurse practitioners entered new orders after pharmacy recommendations, but she did not have access to the recommendations themselves. For another resident, the pharmacist recommended that the prescriber address the ongoing need for Seroquel, as there was no recent documentation of its necessity or the ability to taper the dose. The prescriber disagreed with the recommendation but did not provide a rationale on the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) form or in the medical record. The A-Unit Manager acknowledged that after discussing the case with the prescriber, she failed to document the reason for disagreement on the MRR form, despite signing it after the conversation.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙