Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Assessments for Dialysis, Medication, and Hospice Coding

Fort Pierce, Florida Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four residents, resulting in multiple instances of incorrect coding. For one resident, the admission MDS assessment inaccurately documented that the resident was receiving dialysis services, despite no evidence in the physician orders, progress notes, or resident interview to support this. Two other residents had MDS assessments that incorrectly indicated the administration of antipsychotic medications during the look-back period, although medication and treatment administration records did not show any such medications were given. In both cases, MDS coordinators acknowledged the discrepancies during side-by-side record reviews. Additionally, another resident's quarterly MDS assessment failed to indicate that hospice services were being provided, even though physician orders and progress notes confirmed hospice care had been initiated and was ongoing. The MDS coordinators also acknowledged this error during a review. These inaccuracies were identified through record reviews and staff interviews, with documentation and resident statements directly contradicting the information recorded in the MDS assessments.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙