Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
G

Failure to Identify and Address Significant Weight Loss

Plantation, Florida Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $52,140
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for a resident with multiple medical conditions, including Type 2 Diabetes, End Stage Renal Disease, Anemia, and dependence on dialysis. The facility's policy required prompt re-weighing, notification of the dietitian, and intervention when significant weight loss was detected. Despite these protocols, the resident experienced a 7.5% severe weight loss over a six-week period, which was not addressed by the clinical dietitian or reflected in the nutrition progress notes. The resident's care plan indicated a need to maintain weight within a specific range and to receive dietary evaluation and changes as needed, but these actions were not taken when the weight loss occurred. Observations and interviews revealed that the resident was eating 75-80% of meals and was cognitively intact, able to express preferences and concerns about food choices. The resident reported a decreased appetite and a willingness to consume nutritional supplements, but there was no evidence that additional supplements or interventions were provided after the significant weight loss was identified. The facility's documentation showed inconsistencies in weight monitoring practices, with weights being taken by both facility staff and the dialysis team, sometimes using uncalibrated or malfunctioning scales. This led to discrepancies in recorded weights and confusion about the resident's actual nutritional status. Further compounding the issue, communication between staff members regarding significant weight changes was inconsistent. The dietary technician and CNAs described different processes for weight monitoring and reporting, and the clinical dietitian was not notified or did not respond to the severe weight loss in a timely manner. The facility administrator acknowledged issues with scale accuracy and had recently arranged for calibration, but this action occurred after the deficiency was identified. As a result, the resident continued to lose weight, dropping to 80% of ideal body weight, without appropriate assessment or intervention from the clinical team.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙