Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate Documentation of Resident Assessments

Plantation, Florida Survey Completed on 05-08-2025

Penalty

Fine: $52,140
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of comprehensive assessments for four residents, specifically regarding diagnoses, vision, and oxygen use. For one resident, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) included a diagnosis of schizophrenia, despite no supporting documentation in the medical or psychiatric records. The MDS Registered Nurse acknowledged this discrepancy during a side-by-side review of the resident's records. Another resident's MDS assessment did not reflect the use of oxygen or impaired vision, even though physician orders, care plans, and direct observation confirmed the use of oxygen therapy and a diagnosis of legal blindness. The MDS Coordinator was informed of these inconsistencies but did not provide an immediate explanation for the discrepancies. A third resident's MDS assessment omitted a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), despite it being listed among the resident's medical diagnoses. Interviews with various staff members, including CNAs and nurses, revealed a lack of awareness or documentation regarding the resident's PTSD triggers. The MDS Coordinator confirmed that PTSD should be documented in Section I of the MDS but acknowledged the omission and noted that other MDS Coordinators were not present to address the issue. For the fourth resident, the MDS assessment indicated adequate vision and clear speech, while the care plan documented impaired communication and vision loss due to glaucoma and cataracts. Interviews with the MDS Coordinator and Social Services Director revealed conflicting assessments of the resident's vision status, with the care plan and medical history indicating impairment, but the MDS and social services staff reporting adequate vision. These inconsistencies demonstrate a failure to accurately assess and document residents' conditions in the MDS, as required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙