Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0919
E

Failure to Respond to Call Lights in a Timely Manner

Susanville, California Survey Completed on 04-17-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for five out of five sampled residents, resulting in prolonged wait times for assistance. Multiple residents, all with good cognitive status as indicated by their BIMS scores, reported waiting up to two hours for their call lights to be answered. One resident, who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, and was dependent on supplemental oxygen, described having to leave her room to seek help in the hallway after her call light was not answered. Another resident confirmed witnessing this event and stated that staff were observed laughing and joking outside the room while call lights were ignored. Residents expressed frustration and emotional distress due to these delays, with one resident reporting feelings of anger, worthlessness, and a lack of motivation to eat or participate in daily activities. Family members and residents reported these concerns to facility staff and during Resident Council meetings, where the issue of delayed call light response was repeatedly raised as ongoing. Facility records and interviews confirmed that department heads were conducting daily call light audits in response to these concerns. On one occasion, the Assistant Director of Nursing found a resident in the hallway seeking help after a long wait, and staff were unable to provide documentation of timely responses or progress notes regarding the incident. The facility's policy required call lights to be answered as soon as practicable, but this standard was not met according to resident and family reports, as well as direct observations. Additional residents corroborated the ongoing nature of the problem, with one stating that while they did not frequently use the call light, other residents continued to experience long wait times. Roommates confirmed that during extended delays, they would use the bathroom emergency light to prompt a faster response from staff. Resident Council meeting notes from multiple months documented persistent concerns about untimely call light responses, indicating that the deficiency was not an isolated event but a recurring issue affecting multiple residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙