Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0685
D

Failure to Arrange Timely Ophthalmology Referral and Follow-Up

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident received timely referral, appointment, and follow-up for ophthalmology services as ordered by the physician. The resident, who had a history of diabetes, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, was documented as needing an ophthalmology consultation for diabetic eye examination and cataract management. Despite physician orders and an eye doctor consultation recommending follow-up for cataracts and referral for occult macular dystrophy, the necessary arrangements for these services were not made. Record reviews showed that the resident had been waiting for new glasses for a year and was using inadequate over-the-counter glasses, which did not sufficiently address her vision needs. Interviews with staff revealed that the process for arranging such appointments required communication between licensed nurses, case managers, and the social service director (SSD). However, the SSD was unaware of the eye doctor consultation and its recommendations until the time of the survey, indicating a breakdown in communication and follow-through on the referral process. Facility policy required that social services or their designee assist with appointments, referrals, and transportation for ancillary services, and that orders for such services be relayed promptly. Despite these policies, the resident's referral and follow-up for vision care were not completed, and staff acknowledged that failure to arrange these services could result in worsening vision for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙