Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0692
D

Failure to Complete Timely Nutritional Assessment on Admission

Granada Hills, California Survey Completed on 04-25-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to conduct a nutritional assessment upon admission for one of four sampled residents, as required by its own policy and procedure. The resident in question was originally admitted with multiple diagnoses, including hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Despite these significant health conditions, there was no documented evidence that a nutritional assessment was completed by the dietitian at the time of admission. Record reviews showed that the resident's weight was documented at various points, both in the hospital and at the facility, but there were inconsistencies and strikethrough entries in the weight records. The resident had been refusing to be weighed since January, and the last recorded weight was from that time. The dietitian only completed the nutritional assessment after the resident returned from a hospital stay in April, well beyond the required timeframe for an initial assessment. Interviews with facility staff confirmed that the initial nutritional assessment was not completed as required. The Director of Staff Development acknowledged the absence of documentation for the assessment at admission, and the Registered Dietitian stated she was unaware that the assessment had not been done, attributing the oversight to a transition between dietitians. The facility's policy clearly states that a nutritional assessment should be conducted upon admission, but this was not followed in this case.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙