Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0641
D

Inaccurate MDS Coding for Hospice Status

Hemet, California Survey Completed on 04-14-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for a resident with a history of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and an automatic cardiac defibrillator. The resident was admitted without hospice or dialysis services, later placed on hospice, and never received dialysis. However, a review of the MDS Section O dated January 22, 2025, incorrectly indicated the resident was on dialysis, despite documentation and staff interviews confirming the resident was only on hospice care at that time. The MDS Nurse acknowledged the error, stating the resident was never on dialysis and that the assessment should have reflected hospice care. The Director of Nursing also confirmed that the MDS should have been coded to match the resident's actual status. Facility policy requires that MDS assessments accurately reflect information in progress notes, care plans, and resident observations, which was not followed in this instance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙