Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0684
D

Failure to Accurately Assess Pressure Ulcer and Improper Foley Catheter Management

Orinda, California Survey Completed on 04-09-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A resident with a history of cord compression and a benign neoplasm of the pituitary gland was admitted with limited mobility and a moderate risk for pressure ulcers, as indicated by a Braden Scale score of 13. Despite this risk, there was no care plan in place to address the potential for pressure ulcer development. When a wound was identified on the resident's coccyx, the treatment nurse initially assessed it as a skin tear, despite the presence of thin skin and a darkened area. Two days later, a wound physician correctly identified the wound as a stage 2 pressure ulcer. Nearly four weeks later, the wound had progressed to a stage 4 pressure ulcer. The director of nursing confirmed that the initial assessment was incorrect and that no care plan had been developed for pressure ulcer prevention or management. Additionally, the resident had a foley catheter that was changed from size F16 to F18 without a written physician's order. The nurse practitioner verbally communicated the change, but the order was not properly documented, and the previous order for the F16 catheter was not discontinued. This resulted in both catheter sizes being listed in the treatment administration record, causing confusion among licensed nurses regarding which size to use. The resident expressed concern about staff competency in managing the foley catheter, and the director of nursing acknowledged the lack of proper documentation and order management.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙