Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0583
D

Failure to Protect Resident Privacy and Confidentiality

San Jose, California Survey Completed on 04-18-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to maintain the privacy and confidentiality of residents' personal and medical information for two residents. In one instance, a resident was observed in bed with care instructions posted above the head of the bed, including details such as the need to elevate the head of the bed during feeding and instructions related to left side weakness and repositioning. These instructions were visible to the roommate's visitors. The assistant director of nursing confirmed that the care instructions were still posted and acknowledged that they should have been covered. In another case, a different resident had a care instruction posted above the bed indicating a choking risk and specifying 'no food by mouth.' This information was also visible in the room. A licensed vocational nurse confirmed the observation and stated that the care instruction should not have been posted in that manner. The director of nursing further confirmed that care instructions should be covered when posted. Facility policy reviewed indicated that confidential clinical information, including care needs, should not be openly posted in resident rooms, except for discreet postings for safety reasons.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙