Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
D

Failure to Develop and Implement Resident-Centered Care Plan for DVT

Long Beach, California Survey Completed on 04-21-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered care plan for a resident with a diagnosis of left upper extremity (LUE) deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The responsible party (RP) for the resident had specifically requested that signage be placed above the resident's bed instructing nursing staff to avoid taking blood pressures in the affected left arm, but this request was not honored or implemented. Additionally, the care plan did not include the location of the DVT or provide specific instructions for staff on how to assess for complications related to the DVT, such as monitoring for pain, swelling, warmth, discoloration in the affected extremity, or signs of pulmonary embolism (PE) like difficulty breathing, cough, and chest pain. Record review showed that the resident had a history of atrial fibrillation, acute embolism, and thrombosis of the left upper extremity deep veins, with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Despite these significant medical issues, the care plan lacked necessary interventions and details. Observations confirmed that no sign was present above the resident's bed, and interviews with staff revealed they were unaware of the DVT location or the RP's request. The MDS nurse and DON both acknowledged that the care plan was generic and did not provide adequate information for staff to deliver appropriate care or assessments. The facility's own policies require the interdisciplinary team to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes, and to involve the resident or their representative in the process. However, the failure to include the RP's request and to specify interventions for the resident's DVT resulted in staff not being properly informed or able to assess for complications, as confirmed by staff interviews and record review.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙