Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0690
D

Failure to Monitor and Document Catheter Care and UTI Signs

Montrose, California Survey Completed on 04-10-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring and care for a resident with a suprapubic catheter, as required by both physician orders and facility policy. The resident, who had a history of sepsis, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and anemia, was identified as being at risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) due to the use of a suprapubic catheter. The care plan and physician orders specified that staff should monitor and document urine characteristics such as color, consistency, odor, and presence of blood, as well as secure the catheter with an anchor to prevent dislodgement. However, documentation in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated signs and symptoms of UTI on multiple dates, but did not specify what symptoms were observed or what interventions were provided. Additionally, there was no evidence in the nursing progress notes or catheter assessment that these symptoms were followed up with appropriate care or physician notification. Direct observations and staff interviews revealed further lapses in care. On one occasion, the resident's suprapubic catheter was observed to have pinkish urine output and a foul smell, and the catheter was not secured with an anchor, resulting in leakage. The resident reported being unable to monitor her own urine output and was not informed by nursing staff about her condition. Staff members, including a CNA and treatment nurse, confirmed that the catheter was not properly secured and that the odor was noticeable, but the treatment nurse was unaware of the pink urine until later in the day. The Director of Nursing acknowledged that the catheter should have been anchored at all times and that staff should have reported abnormal findings immediately. Interviews with nursing staff indicated a lack of detailed documentation and follow-up regarding the signs and symptoms of UTI noted in the TAR. Staff admitted that documentation was incomplete and that interventions were not clearly recorded. Facility policy required that catheter care include securing the catheter, observing for complications, and recording detailed information about urine characteristics and any unusual findings. These requirements were not met, resulting in a failure to accurately monitor and respond to potential UTIs and catheter-related complications for the resident.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙