Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0550
E

Residents Labeled as 'Feeders' in Staff Assignments

Los Angeles, California Survey Completed on 04-04-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to treat twelve residents who required feeding assistance with respect and dignity by referring to them as "feeders" and maintaining a list labeled as such for staff assignment purposes. Staff, including CNAs, LVNs, the DON, and the MDS coordinator, consistently used the term "feeders" to identify and assign residents needing feeding assistance. This terminology was used in staff communications, written lists, and verbal exchanges, and was acknowledged by multiple staff members during interviews. The list of "feeders" was used to distribute workload among staff, and the term was used both in conversation and in written documentation. The residents involved had significant medical needs, including diagnoses such as diabetes Type 2, muscle weakness, Parkinson's disease, quadriplegia, schizophrenia, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Most of these residents had severely impaired cognition and required substantial or maximal assistance with all activities of daily living, including eating. Some residents had intact cognition but still required extensive assistance. The use of the term "feeders" was applied regardless of cognitive status, and staff described entire rooms as being "feeders" and discussed their care in these terms. Facility policy required that residents be treated with dignity and respect, including being addressed by their name of choice and prohibiting demeaning practices. However, staff interviews and record reviews confirmed that the practice of labeling and referring to residents as "feeders" was routine and accepted among staff, despite the policy. The report notes that this practice caused or had the potential to cause depression among the affected residents.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙