Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0656
E

Failure to Develop and Implement Comprehensive, Person-Centered Care Plans

Woodland Hills, California Survey Completed on 04-11-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for multiple residents, resulting in disorganized documentation and the omission of critical interventions. For two residents with multiple medical conditions and cognitive impairments, the care plans listed all medical problems together without grouping them by specific issues, and the associated goals and interventions were not tailored to individual problems. Instead, interventions were mixed together, making it difficult for staff to identify which actions corresponded to which medical issues. Both nursing and administrative staff acknowledged that this disorganization could lead to delays in care and miscommunication among healthcare providers. In another instance, a resident who expressed a desire to smoke was assessed by the interdisciplinary team and determined to require the use of a smoking apron for safety. However, the resident's care plan did not include the intervention of wearing the apron, despite this being identified as necessary in the assessment. Staff interviews confirmed that the omission was an oversight, and that the care plan is the primary tool used to communicate required interventions to all staff. The absence of this intervention in the care plan created the potential for staff to allow the resident to smoke without the required safety equipment. The facility's own policies and procedures require that care plans be comprehensive, coordinated, and based on individual assessments, including specific goals, interventions, and review dates. In each of the cases reviewed, the care plans did not meet these requirements, as they failed to clearly communicate individualized problems and interventions, and in one case, omitted a critical safety intervention altogether.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙