Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0657
D

Failure to Revise Care Plan and Assist with Community Discharge Planning

Geneva, Ohio Survey Completed on 05-15-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

A deficiency was identified when the facility failed to revise a resident's comprehensive care plan to reflect her expressed desire to live in the community and did not provide adequate discharge planning assistance. The resident, who had multiple diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, diabetes, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and major depression, was admitted with an initial care plan indicating long-term placement. Although the resident initially agreed to stay at the facility, she later communicated her wish to leave and live independently in an apartment, despite previous eviction issues. Documentation showed that after the resident expressed her intent to leave, the facility offered referrals to other facilities, which she declined, but did not explore or document other community-based options. There was no evidence in the care plan or nursing notes that her request to return to the community was addressed or that interventions were implemented to support her discharge goal. The facility's own policy required documentation of the resident's preferences and referrals to local contact agencies, but this was not done. Interviews with the social service designee and the resident's mother confirmed that the resident's preference for community living was not incorporated into her care plan, and no efforts were made to assist her in finding community options. The resident ultimately left the facility without a formal discharge plan, and her mother reported that the facility did not provide support for her daughter's goal to live outside the facility.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙