Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0604
D

Failure to Ensure Resident is Free from Physical Restraints

Martin, Tennessee Survey Completed on 04-03-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as required by their policy. The policy, dated June 2017, mandates that restraints should only be used when medically necessary and after a thorough evaluation. However, Resident #29, who was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Repeated Falls, Dementia, and Anxiety, was observed with a self-release waist belt in her wheelchair. Despite the facility's policy, there was no assessment for a trunk restraint, and the resident's care plan included an intervention for a self-release seatbelt without proper evaluation. Observations over several days revealed that Resident #29 was unable to release the waist belt independently, indicating it functioned as a restraint. During an interview, the DON confirmed the presence of the restraint and acknowledged the need for monitoring and assessment. The DON also mentioned that the resident's daughter insisted on the use of the belt due to previous falls, but the resident's inability to release the belt contradicted the claim that it was not a restraint.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙