Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0600
D

Neglect in Incontinence Care for a Resident

Norristown, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 03-20-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

Norriton Square was found to be non-compliant with the requirement to ensure residents are free from neglect, as outlined in 42 CFR Part 483.12(a)(1). The deficiency was identified during an abbreviated survey following complaints, where it was determined that a resident, identified as R12, did not receive adequate incontinence care. The facility's policy on abuse and neglect, which prohibits mistreatment and mandates effective communication and training, was not adhered to in this instance. The resident, who had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene due to a left hip fracture, was found soiled with urine, and their wound dressing was also soiled. This neglect was attributed to a nursing assistant, Employee E3, who admitted to overlooking the resident due to being overwhelmed with the care of eighteen patients. Resident R12 had a complex medical history, including a non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur, chronic embolism and thrombosis of the vein, diabetes with neuropathy, and a personal history of transient ischemic attack. The resident's care plan highlighted the need for regular monitoring for skin irritation and repositioning every two hours to prevent skin breakdown, as the resident had a stage three pressure ulcer on the sacrum. Despite these documented needs, the facility failed to provide the necessary care, resulting in the substantiated report of neglect. The nursing home administrator confirmed the neglect after an investigation and noted that Employee E3 had prior disciplinary actions related to care concerns.

Plan Of Correction

1. R12 has discharged from the facility. 2. NPE or designee will re-educate staff on OPS300 Abuse Prohibition policy with review of the definition of Neglect. 3. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct an initial audit of incontinent residents to ensure incontinence care was provided. 4. The Director of Nursing or designee will conduct random weekly audits x 12 weeks of 10 incontinent residents to ensure incontinence care was provided. 5. NHA or designee to review the results of these audits will be reviewed at the monthly QAPI meeting x 3 months.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙