Inadequate Pureed Diet Consistency
Summary
The facility failed to provide the correct diet consistency for residents on pureed diets, as observed during multiple visits to the main kitchen. The pureed meals prepared for residents did not meet the required smooth, pudding-like consistency as per the facility's policy and guidelines set by the National Task Force. Observations revealed that the pureed hamburger had a grainy consistency, and the pureed vegetables were lumpy. Additionally, the pureed turkey contained small pieces, indicating a failure to achieve the necessary texture. Resident #47, who was on a pureed diet due to a medical condition affecting their ability to swallow, received a meal with a pureed roll that was lumpy and grainy. The resident's meal ticket matched the meal tray, but the consistency did not meet the required standards. Interviews with the Registered Dietitian and Speech Therapist confirmed that the pureed diet should be smooth and lump-free, resembling mashed potatoes, which was not the case during the observations. Resident #175 and Resident #77 also received pureed meals that did not meet the required consistency. Resident #175's meal had a loose puree consistency with liquid pooling around the food, leading to a low intake of the meal. Similarly, Resident #77's meal had a loose puree consistency with liquid pooling, and the resident expressed dissatisfaction with the flavor, resulting in a refusal to eat the rest of the meal. These observations indicate a consistent failure to provide pureed meals in the correct form, potentially affecting the nutritional intake and satisfaction of residents on pureed diets.
Plan Of Correction
F805 FOOD IN FORM TO MEET INDIVIDUAL NEEDS 1. What corrective action(s) will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the practice: 1) In the allegation of the pureed food on the lunch meal tray line, the Pureed consistency was considered not to be the proper consistency. Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. 2) In the allegation of the pureed food on the lunch meal tray line, the Pureed consistency was considered not to be the proper consistency. Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. 3) In the allegation of Resident #47, the Pureed consistency was considered not to be the proper consistency. Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. 4) In the allegation of Resident #175, the Pureed consistency was considered not to be the proper consistency. Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. 5) In the allegation of Resident #77, the Pureed consistency was considered not to be the proper consistency. Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. 2. How you will identify other residents having potential to be affected by the same practice and what corrective action will be taken: All residents in the facility have the potential to be affected by these practices. 3. What measures will be put into place or what systematic changes you will make to ensure that the practice does not recur: The measures put into place/systemic changes made to ensure the standards are met: Cooks will be in-serviced as to the proper consistency of pureed food. Random QA audits will be conducted by the Dietary Manager or a qualified Designee, weekly for one month, then biweekly for another one month and then monthly for one month or until substantial compliance has been determined. 4. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not recur, i.e., what quality assurance program will be put into place: Random QA audit will be conducted by the Dietary Manager or a qualified Designee, weekly for one month, then biweekly for another one month and then monthly for one month or until substantial compliance has been determined. Findings of the QA audits will be reported in the Monthly QAPI meeting by the Director of Nursing or a qualified Designee for a period of three months and until substantial compliance is met. Corrective action completion date:
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A resident with dementia, dysphagia, and muscle weakness had a physician order for a chopped texture diet, but was served unchopped quiche and matzoh balls during a meal. The family member reported this happened often and said they had to chop the resident's food themselves, while the DON and DFD confirmed the resident should have received the correct texture and that some items were not chopped before being sent to the unit.
Failure to Follow Ordered Texture Diet: A resident with dysphagia and an ordered puree/liquified diet received sponge cake instead of the prescribed texture. The resident later developed N/V, SOB, and possible aspiration after eating non-pureed food, requiring ED evaluation via 911. The DM confirmed the wrong texture was served, and the DON/ADON acknowledged that diet orders were not followed.
A resident with a dysphagia puree diet order was served a regular consistency roll at lunch. An NA buttered the roll and gave it to the resident in the dining room until a surveyor intervened and had it removed; the NA acknowledged the resident should not have received it.
Incorrect Diet Texture Served to a Resident with Dysphagia: A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dysphagia, and malnutrition was ordered a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, but staff served meals with incorrect textures, including whole asparagus, thick-cut bacon, and a whole hard-boiled egg. The NA said she was new and did not know the resident’s diet needs, while dietary staff said the meal tickets and food preparation were inconsistent and that some items were not prepared to the ordered texture.
A resident with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, and malnutrition did not receive diet care consistent with the ARNP’s orders. Staff failed to transcribe updated orders for honey-thick liquids and specific feeding instructions into the EMR/Kardex, the resident continued receiving a nectar-thick supplement, and staff were observed feeding and assisting the resident from the wrong side instead of the ordered right side.
Failure to Serve Ground Meatloaf for Mechanical Soft Diets: The facility did not serve ground meatloaf as listed on the menu extension sheet for residents on mechanical soft diets. During tray line service, a dietary staff member stated there was no ground meatloaf because she had been told the meatloaf was mechanical soft friendly. The DM and RD agreed with that interpretation, while the ST stated mechanical soft meats are typically ground and that the affected residents should have received ground meatloaf.
Resident on chopped diet received unchopped meal items
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with a physician-ordered chopped texture diet received food prepared in the correct form. The resident had diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, and muscle weakness, and care plan interventions called for diet and food consistency per physician order, along with assistance and monitoring during meals. The physician order required no concentrated sweets, chopped texture, and thin liquids, and a speech language pathologist note documented that the resident continued to tolerate a chopped diet with thin liquids. On the dinner meal in question, the resident was served a slice of quiche and matzoh balls in soup that were not chopped, despite the chopped diet order. The resident's family member stated they often had to chop the resident's food themselves and reported that the unchopped meal was shown to an LPN. The Director of Food Services confirmed the resident was on a chopped texture diet and received unchopped quiche and matzoh balls, and stated these items were not chopped before delivery to the unit because kitchen staff did not chop certain foods to preserve their structure and presentation. The DON stated nursing staff must ensure residents on mechanically altered diets received the appropriate textured food, and the LPN stated they would chop food upon request but could not recall whether they assisted with this meal.
Failure to Follow Ordered Texture Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a resident with dysphagia received food prepared in the ordered texture. Resident 1 was admitted with multiple diagnoses, including dysphagia, and the MDS indicated difficulty swallowing and a mechanically altered diet. The resident’s OSR listed a liquified texture diet, and the care plan directed staff to follow the diet/MD order. Despite these orders, the resident received sponge cake, which was not the prescribed puree-type texture. The physician progress note documented that the resident had been sent to the ED via 911 after nausea, vomiting, and possible aspiration following ingestion of non-pureed food. The note stated the resident developed nausea/vomiting and shortness of breath after consuming pound cake with raisins despite being on a strict pureed diet due to dysphagia, and was noted to have spitting up mucus and vomiting, raising concern for aspiration. The Dietary Manager confirmed the resident received a different texture than ordered, and the ADON acknowledged that all diet orders were expected to be followed and confirmed the resident’s prescribed diet was not followed.
Inappropriate Food Texture Served to Resident on Puree Diet
Penalty
Summary
Food was not provided in a form designed to meet an individual resident’s needs when Resident #111, who had an order for a regular diet with dysphagia puree texture and thin liquids, was served a regular consistency roll at lunch. The resident’s diet order also included fortified cereal at breakfast, fortified soup at lunch and dinner, and a two-handled cup with lid for meals. During a dining room observation, Nurse Aide #64 served the resident’s lunch tray and buttered a regular roll for the resident. Before the resident ate it, the State surveyor intervened and had the nurse aide remove the roll. Nurse Aide #64 confirmed the resident was on a puree diet and should not have received a regular roll, stating, “Yeah, you’re right,” and that she did not think it looked right.
Incorrect Diet Texture Served to Resident with Dysphagia
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure that a severely cognitively impaired resident with dysphagia received the ordered mechanical soft diet texture. The resident had diagnoses including oropharyngeal phase dysphagia and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and the record showed she was edentulous with dentures not available during a prior hospital SLP evaluation. The SLP documented oral holding and prolonged oral transit with puree solids and thin liquids, and later recommended a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids, small bites and sips, slow rate, and supervision while eating. During observation, the resident was served meals that did not match the ordered texture. At lunch, the tray contained a whole soft dinner roll, ground turkey chili with beans over cream of rice, and whole asparagus spears; the resident attempted to eat the asparagus but was unsuccessful. At breakfast, the tray contained a large slice of thick cut bacon and a whole hard-boiled egg with only a small area of teeth indentation. The meal tickets indicated mechanical soft textures, but the foods served did not match the ordered diet texture for the resident. Interviews with nursing and dietary staff showed confusion and inconsistency in how the diet order was interpreted and prepared. The NA who delivered the trays stated she was new and did not know the resident required a mechanical soft diet or that certain foods needed to be ground or mashed. The Dietary Manager stated the facility did not offer a mechanical soft ground diet, did not know why the ticket reflected that notation, and was not aware that asparagus should have been chopped or that the hard-boiled egg needed to be mashed. The SLP, RD, DON, NP, and Administrator all stated the resident should have received the correct mechanical soft texture, and staff acknowledged that the incorrect textures were served on both observed meals.
Failure to Follow and Transcribe Ordered Therapeutic Diet
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to serve the appropriate therapeutic diet for Resident #5 according to the resident’s diet order. Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, non-Alzheimer’s disease, and malnutrition. The resident’s MDS documented a mechanically altered diet, and the care plan directed staff to provide the diet as ordered and monitor for signs and symptoms of aspiration or difficulty swallowing. A diet order dated 4/13/26 directed a regular diet with pureed texture and nectar-thick fluids, and a progress note dated 7/2/26 documented new physician orders and feeding instructions for honey-thick liquids, positioning on the resident’s right side, giving a drink after each bite, and continuing the pureed diet. The resident’s record was not updated to reflect the new physician orders and feeding instructions in the physician order tab or Kardex. The July 2026 MAR listed a mighty shake as nectar-thick, and the resident received the nectar-thick supplement from 7/2/26 through 7/20/26. On 7/21/26, surveyors observed thickened water with a lid and straw in the resident’s room, and the DON verified it was nectar consistency. Later that morning, Staff B provided one-on-one feeding assistance while sitting on the resident’s left side instead of the right side ordered by the ARNP, and Staff C also sat on the resident’s left side while assisting with the mighty shake. The DON acknowledged staff did not transcribe the 7/2/26 physician orders to the electronic medical record.
Failure to Serve Ground Meatloaf for Mechanical Soft Diets
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure ground meatloaf was served for residents on mechanically altered diets according to the menu extension sheet. The lunch menu for 07/22/26 listed homemade meatloaf, mashed potatoes with gravy, and California blend vegetables, and the menu extension sheet specified that the mechanical soft meatloaf should be ground using a #10 scoop with one ounce of gravy, while pureed meatloaf and vegetables had separate serving sizes. During observation of the lunch tray line, the dietary staff member plating the meals stated there was no ground meatloaf for the mechanical soft diets because she had been told the meatloaf was mechanical soft friendly. Review of the diet type report showed four residents received a mechanical soft diet and one resident received a regular diet with ground meat. The Dietary Manager and Registered Dietitian stated the meatloaf was considered mechanical soft friendly even though the menu extension indicated it should be ground for the mechanical soft diet. The Speech Therapist stated that for mechanical soft diets, meats were typically ground, that meatloaf was considered a formed food unless cut up, and that residents on a mechanical soft diet should have received ground meat. She also verified that four residents she knew needed ground meat and confirmed that the resident she did not know received a mechanical soft diet and should have received ground meatloaf per the menu extension sheet.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release October 8, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.