Failure to Address Flooring Hazards Leads to Resident Injury
Summary
The facility failed to maintain a safe environment for its residents, particularly in the memory care unit, where a clean-out drain in a high-traffic area was not properly repaired. This oversight led to an unsafe walkway, resulting in a resident tripping and suffering a significant injury. The resident, who had a history of difficulty walking and other medical conditions, was ambulating in the hallway when she tripped over the uneven flooring and tape that was not adequately securing the area. This incident caused a significant change in the resident's ability to walk independently and perform activities of daily living, necessitating surgical intervention. The facility's maintenance records revealed that a work order was created to address the missing clean-out cover, but the issue was not resolved promptly. Instead, temporary measures such as placing a metal sheet and tape over the area were used, which proved inadequate. The Director of Maintenance acknowledged the delay in obtaining the necessary materials to fix the problem and admitted to attempting to handle the repair in-house before calling in professional plumbers. This delay in addressing the hazard contributed to the resident's fall and subsequent injury. Interviews with staff members indicated that the area was known to be a hazard, yet it remained unrepaired for an extended period. The staff, including the Director of Nursing and Certified Nursing Assistants, were aware of the incident and the resident's condition post-fall. The facility's failure to promptly and effectively address the flooring issues and provide adequate supervision and assistance devices placed the resident and others at risk for serious injury.
Plan Of Correction
Immediate action(s) taken for the resident(s) found to have been affected include: Flooring was repaired to prevent further accidents. Resident # 6 is no longer resides in the facility. 2. Identification of other residents having the potential to be affected: NHA and Director of Maintenance performed rounds of the facility to identify any hazardous areas. Identified hazards removed and/or repaired. 3. Actions taken/ systems put in place to reduce the risk of future occurrence include: DCS/Designee provided education on Accidents and Supervision policy, redirecting residents with from environmental hazards, and recognizing and reporting potential environmental hazards. An additional staff member has been assigned to memory care unit as Hall Monitor to increase supervision. 4. How the corrective action(s) will be monitored to ensure the practice will not reoccur: Administrator/Director of Maintenance/Designee will complete facility assessment rounds to make certain facility is free of hazards once weekly x 8 weeks; then every w weekly x 4 weeks and will continue weekly rounds ongoing. Quality reviews will be completed once a week x8 weeks and then every 2 weeks x1 month. Quality reviews will be reviewed by the QAPI committee monthly x 3 months or until substantial compliance is met along with quarterly reviews.
Removal Plan
- Immediate Action: Environmental rounds completed, identified areas of concern noted.
- Summoned Corporate Plant Operations support team for assistance.
- Quality review completed for all current residents sustaining a fall to ensure plan of care is in place, no discrepancies noted.
- Medical Record Review of all residents with falls with major injury conducted: no discrepancies noted.
- 99.5% of all facility staff were educated.
- Initiated and assigned direct care staff member as 'Hallway Safety Monitor' on secure unit for additional supervision.
- Identification of others at risk was accomplished by reassessing all residents residing in the facility for fall risk via Fall Risk Evaluation.
- Facility implemented Activities Invitation Rounds for residents identified at risk for falls.
- The Care Plan Coordinator(s) completed review of care plans to ensure all residents identified as 'at risk' for falls had safety measures, as well as resident specific interventions in place.
- Quality review completed for monitoring of environmental hazards with a focus on uneven surfaces and hazards.
- Identified environmental concerns addressed by priority level, initiated repairs and ongoing.
- Record review of Resident #6 completed.
- Actions to Prevent Occurrence/Recurrence: NHA, DCS, and Plant Operations/Maintenance Director re-educated on ensuring resident environment is free of hazards with emphasis on timely completion.
- Regional DCS educated the DCS on the facility's Fall Prevention Program, all facility related policies, how to conduct an RCA, and how to ensure incident investigations are timely and complete.
- DCS/designee re-educated staff on facility Fall Prevention Program guidelines, following care plan/Kardex interventions, as well as all facility related policies.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on Residents' Rights.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on Accidents and Supervision Policy.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on Recognizing & Reporting Hazards.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on Redirecting Residents with Dementia from Environmental Hazards.
- DCS/Designee re-educated staff on securing hazardous areas until plant ops clears, ensuring no harm.
- The Director of Clinical Services/designee to conduct quality monitoring of new admission fall risk evaluation completion to ensure that risk factors, safety measures, and resident specific interventions are reflected on the care plan and Kardex.
- A Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) has been initiated to report on the above monitoring and auditing procedures.
- NHA/Plant Ops/Designee will round to ensure facility is free of hazards.
- DON/designee will review all falls at the clinical meeting with the IDT (interdisciplinary) to ensure appropriate interventions are implemented, the resident's care plan has been reviewed and revised, and the Kardex has been updated.
- Regional DCS will review to ensure a RCA (root cause analysis) has been conducted and that resident specific interventions are reflected in the care plan as well as updated on the Kardex.
- Verification of the facility's removal plan was conducted by the survey team.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
Unsafe Cord Placement and Failure to Follow Fall Interventions: A resident with cognitive impairment and wheelchair use had a TV power cord stretched tightly across the closet doorway, blocking access and creating an environmental hazard when staff had to lift the cord to open the closet. Another resident with severe cognitive impairment and a fall-risk care plan repeatedly ran barefoot in the hallway while staff observed but did not consistently provide planned interventions such as gripper socks, footwear, ambulation assistance, or redirection.
A resident with impaired cognition, cancer, non-Alzheimer's dementia, extensive ADL needs, and a fall history was identified as a high fall risk with care plan interventions including removing a movable bedside table. After a fall, the resident was found using the table as a walker, yet observations showed the table still placed beside the bed on multiple occasions, including when staff were present. Staff interviews confirmed they were unaware of the current fall prevention interventions and that the table remained at bedside for meals despite the care plan.
Failure to complete a restraint assessment before using a wheelchair alarm for a resident with muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan included the alarm as an intervention, but the record lacked an initial Restraint Evaluation, and the CNO confirmed the assessment had not been completed before the alarm was placed.
A resident with cognitive deficits, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, fracture, and repeated falls was dependent for toileting and care planned for an EZ stand with 2-person assist. During observed transfers, staff placed the harness and straps correctly, but the resident only rose to about 135 degrees and never came to a full stand, while staff remained by the bathroom door during privacy periods and continued the transfer despite the resident not standing fully. An RN stated the resident was expected to stand straight up with the EZ stand and that staff should sit the resident back down and try again if not.
A resident with Alzheimer's disease and dementia was found wandering in the parking lot after leaving the building unsupervised. A family member visiting another resident saw her looking into car windows and alerted staff, who were not aware she had exited until the report. Staff interviews showed the resident had been seen earlier eating in the dining room, but no one was actively looking for her or knew she had left the facility.
A resident with parkinsonism and Alzheimer's disease, severe cognitive impairment, and a fall history was pushed in her wheelchair without foot pedals and was not assisted when she called out for help. Nursing notes and staff interviews showed a CNA propelled the resident multiple times without foot pedals, including one instance where her socked foot hit the floor, and staff acknowledged that foot pedals should be used when pushing a resident.
Unsafe Cord Placement and Failure to Follow Fall Interventions
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a television power cord was properly secured and maintained so it did not create an environmental accident hazard for R46. R46’s quarterly MDS identified moderate cognitive impairment, maximum assistance needed for dressing, grooming, and toileting hygiene, moderate assistance with transfers, and wheelchair use. During observation, R46 was in his room with the television mounted on the wall between the bathroom and closet, and the power cord ran across the closet doors and across the upper drawer of the dresser to a surge protector on top of the dresser. When R46 tried to open the closet doors, the cord was stretched tightly across the doorway and prevented the doors from opening fully unless the cord was lifted away. A later observation showed NA-D had to lift the cord above the closet door to open it and retrieve clothing. NA-D stated the cord had been positioned that way for about one year and could be dangerous if R46 pulled on it, and maintenance staff stated they were only notified that day that the television needed to be fixed. The facility also failed to ensure fall interventions were followed for R13, who had severe cognitive impairment with disorganized thinking and inattention, verbal behaviors toward others, and dependence on staff for footwear and partial to moderate assistance with dressing. R13’s care plan identified her as at risk for falls and included interventions such as ambulating with the resident, encouraging gripper socks, obtaining slip-on shoes, reducing noise, offering snacks, assisting her back to her room when running in the hallway, offering a wheelchair, and redirecting her to slow down. During observations, R13 repeatedly exited her room barefoot and ran through the hallway, including multiple times over an extended period, while staff observed but did not provide gripper socks or shoes, walk with her, redirect her to slow down, or offer other care-planned interventions. Staff interviews indicated they had difficulty redirecting her because she became agitated, and the DON stated the care plan should be followed to ensure safety.
Failure to Follow Fall Prevention Care Plan
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to implement care planned interventions to prevent further falls for one resident who was reviewed for falls. The resident had moderate impaired cognition, diagnoses including cancer and non-Alzheimer's dementia, required extensive assistance with ADLs including toileting, transfers, and locomotion, and had a history of falls. The resident's care plan identified the resident as a high fall risk related to de-conditioning, cognitive deficits, and prior falls, and included interventions such as anti-rollbacks on the wheelchair, appropriate footwear, keeping a wheelchair behind the resident when ambulating, and removing the mobile bedside table from beside the bed. After a fall in which the resident was found on the floor by the room doorway with the mobile bedside table in the hallway next to him, the resident stated he had been using the table as a walker. Despite the care plan and post-fall assessment identifying removal of the mobile bedside table as an intervention, observations showed the movable bedside table still placed alongside the bed on multiple occasions, including when staff were present in the room. Staff interviews confirmed they were unaware of the current fall prevention interventions, acknowledged the table was movable, and stated it remained at the bedside to facilitate meals. The DON confirmed the table had been at the bedside and was removed only after the surveyor discussed it with staff.
Failure to complete restraint assessment before wheelchair alarm use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to complete a restraint assessment before implementing a wheelchair alarm for Resident #18. Resident #18 was admitted with multiple diagnoses including muscle weakness, difficulty walking, repeated falls, and dementia. The care plan for impaired mobility and fall risk, dated 3/8/26, included a wheelchair alarm as an intervention. A Bed Safety and Transfer Device Evaluation dated 4/28/26 documented that the bed/chair alarm did not restrict mobility, but the record did not include an initial Restraint Evaluation dated on or around 3/8/26 to identify the comprehensive evaluation of the chair alarm. On 7/9/26, the CNO stated that a Restraint Evaluation had not been completed prior to the chair alarm being placed for Resident #18.
Inadequate Supervision During EZ Stand Transfers
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance for one resident during transfers with an EZ stand lift. The resident had cognitive deficits and was dependent for toileting, with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, fracture, and repeated falls. The care plan identified a moderate fall risk related to weakness and directed toileting with an EZ stand and 2-person assist. During observation, nursing assistants placed the harness, safety belt, straps, and loops appropriately and assisted the resident with the lift, but the resident stood only to approximately 135 degrees and never came to a full stand. On two observed transfers, staff remained by the bathroom door while the resident was given privacy, then re-entered to continue the transfer and complete care. In both observations, the resident never achieved a full standing position despite encouragement and repeated attempts. One nursing assistant stated the transfer was safe because two staff were assisting, while the RN case manager stated she expected the resident to stand straight up when transferred with the EZ stand and that staff should sit the resident back down and try again if the resident did not. The RN case manager was unaware of any concerns about the resident transferring safely with the EZ stand. Facility policy was requested but not provided.
Resident Left Unsupervised and Was Found Wandering in Parking Lot
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to recognize that a cognitively impaired resident had left the building unsupervised and was wandering in the parking lot. The resident had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety disorder, and records showed she had moderately impaired cognition, walked and transferred independently, and had no documented wandering behaviors during the MDS lookback period. Although an elopement evaluation had previously concluded she was not at risk for elopement, the care plan identified confusion, impaired cognition, and lack of awareness of safety needs. On the day of the event, a family member visiting another resident saw the resident outside in the parking lot looking into car windows and walking from car to car with a jacket and pocketbook on her arm. The family member stated the resident appeared to be looking for someone and was in the middle area of the parking lot before she reported it to staff. Nurse #3 was notified and went to check on the resident, who was then brought back inside the facility. Staff interviews showed they were not actively looking for the resident and did not know she had exited the facility unsupervised until the family member reported seeing her outside. Staff accounts indicated the resident had been seen earlier in the dining room eating, but no one was aware she had left the building. Nurse #2 and NA #1 both stated they were not aware the resident was missing until the report from the family member. The administrator stated the resident exited through the front entrance doors, but it was not known whether she pushed the button behind the receptionist desk or was let out by a visitor. The previous NP stated the resident needed someone with her if she was outside the facility and could have wandered away if left alone.
Failure to Respond to Help Requests and Use Foot Pedals During Wheelchair Transport
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for R25 when staff did not respond to her requests for help and did not provide foot pedals while propelling her wheelchair. R25 had diagnoses of parkinsonism and Alzheimer's disease, and her records documented severely impaired cognition, including a BIMS score of four on a quarterly MDS. Her care plan stated she was independent with locomotion in her manual wheelchair, but other documentation reflected a history of falls and need for staff assistance with wheelchair mobility. The care plan also lacked documentation regarding foot pedals. Nursing notes and staff interviews showed multiple instances in which R25 was pushed in her wheelchair without foot pedals. On one occasion, a CNA propelled her out of the restroom and her socked foot hit the floor when the wheelchair was pushed. On another occasion, R25 was seated in her wheelchair, holding onto the back of a recliner and calling out for help, while the CNA walked by her. The CNA later propelled R25 down the hallway without foot pedals and at one point pushed the chair and let it go. Staff interviews confirmed that residents should have foot pedals when staff are pushing them, and the CNA stated she should not push R25 without foot pedals.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.