Failure to Update Care Plan for Resident with Exit-Seeking Behaviors
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for a resident who became a ward of the state and was deemed wholly disabled. Despite the resident's need for assistance in managing personal and financial affairs, the care plan did not reflect the appointment of a state guardian or how this guardianship could affect the resident's care. Additionally, the care plan did not address the resident's exit-seeking behaviors, which were documented on multiple occasions. On a specific date, the resident exhibited exit-seeking behaviors and was placed on 15-minute checks. However, the facility did not update the care plan to include these behaviors or the necessary interventions. The resident was observed roaming the facility with personal items and expressing delusions of going home, yet these behaviors were not incorporated into the care plan. Consequently, the resident was able to exit the facility unsupervised, which was later identified as an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Interviews with facility staff revealed that the resident was known to roam the facility and required supervision at all times due to cognitive status and delusional behaviors. Despite this knowledge, the care plan was not updated to reflect the resident's needs for supervision and the risk of elopement. The failure to address these critical aspects in the care plan posed a significant risk to the resident's safety and well-being.
Removal Plan
- Resident #1's medical record was updated to include guardian information.
- The guardian was invited to attend a care conference, and the State guardian attended the meeting.
- Upon Resident #1's return to the facility, the Signature Care Consultant completed a skin, psychosocial, and pain assessment. No issues were noted.
- Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 supervision and remained 1:1 until discharge.
- Resident #1's care plan was updated to include 1:1 as an intervention by the Social Services.
- Social Services completed an exit seeking elopement observation and deemed resident #1 at risk for elopement.
- Social Services initiated an elopement care plan.
- Social Services added Resident #1 to the elopement binder.
- The Facility Corporation Consultant educated the identified receptionist on reviewing the elopement binder before allowing unsupervised residents out of the facility.
- All current residents were reassessed for exit-seeking observations by Social Services.
- Any residents identified as at risk for exit seeking had their care plans reviewed and revised as indicated.
- The Facility Corporation Consultant conducted a look back in the EMR on all events in the facility for exit-seeking behaviors; no concerns identified.
- The Facility Corporation Care Consultant completed a review of progress notes for exit-seeking behaviors and/or elopement identified in the EMR for all residents.
- The floor nurse assessed new admissions for exit seeking; none were identified as at risk for exit seeking.
- The MOS nurse prepared a list of the state guardians' residents. The MOS support implemented a state-appointed guardianship care plan for all identified residents.
- The Systemic Change sign posted by the Facility Administrator on the entry door states that authorized residents are only permitted beyond this point.
- The Facility Corporation Consultant educated the facility administrator and DON on the Elopement Policy, Leave of absence policy, Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, Safety and Supervision of Resident Policy, and Change of Condition Policy.
- The Facility Corporation Consultant, Director of Nursing, Administrator, or Unit Manager completed an in-service with all staff currently present or working in the facility on the Elopement Policy, Leave of absence policy, Comprehensive Care Plan Policy, Safety and Supervision of Resident Policy, and Change of Condition Policy.
- The Independent Risk Manager and NAME President of Clinical Services educated the Facility Administrator, Director of Nursing, Special Projects Administrator, Business Office Manager, HR Business Partner, Plant OPS Assistant, Environmental Services Manager, Plant Operations Director, Dietary Services Manager, Life Enrichment Director, Environmental Account manager, Unit Managers, MDS coordinators, Admissions Director, Rehabilitation Manager, Social Services, and Signature Care Consultant on needing to notify the State Guardian if their resident attempts and/or requests to leave facility unsupervised for approval.
- Facility Corporation Consultant, DON, ADON, or UM's will audit random resident's progress notes looking for exit-seeking behaviors until substantial compliance is achieved.
- Facility Corporation Consultant, DON, or UM's will audit all new admissions with an appointed State guardian to ensure a care plan is developed to include the State appointed guardian is notified if the resident requests or attempts to leave unsupervised until substantial compliance is achieved.
Penalty
Resources
Below are regulatory guidelines relevant to this citation:
A resident with dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition had a care plan directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots while in bed. During observation, he was found in bed without the boots, and an LPN confirmed his heels were not offloaded even though they should have been.
Failure to care plan depression: A resident with MDD and ongoing depressive symptoms had psychology evaluations documenting depressed mood, loss of interest, sleep disturbance, fatigue, and appetite changes, and the MDS listed depression as an active dx. However, the care plan did not include depression as a focus area, and the MDS Coordinator and DON both stated it should have been care planned.
Incomplete care planning for ordered medications and diabetic footwear. The facility did not include ordered meds such as Eszopiclone, Lexapro, Mirtazapine, and Zolpidem in residents' comprehensive care plans, and one resident was not measured for diabetic shoes and insoles per MD order. The MDS Coordinator said the missing medication care plans were an oversight, while the DON and Administrator stated care plans are used to direct and guide resident care.
A facility failed to include person-centered comprehensive care plan focus areas for two residents receiving ordered meds. One resident with atrial fibrillation was receiving Eliquis, and another resident with insomnia was receiving Trazodone, but neither current care plan addressed the medication use. The MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for care plan development and said the omissions were due to oversight.
Failure to update a resident’s fall care plan with a Geri-chair intervention. A resident with dementia, osteoarthritis, diabetes, severe cognitive impairment, and a history of falls had a care plan listing multiple fall precautions, but after a witnessed fall and a physician order for a Geri-chair or tilt back WC, the care plan was not updated to include that intervention. Surveyors observed the resident in a Geri-chair, and the MDS Coordinator and DON acknowledged the care plan had not been updated.
Failure to care plan a resident’s impaired hearing. A resident with dementia and a history of hard of hearing was observed unable to hear normal conversation and stated he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD and RN confirmed no care plan had been initiated for the hearing impairment or hearing aid refusal, and the DON stated the condition should have been care planned per facility policy and MDS triggers.
Failure to Offload Heels as Directed
Penalty
Summary
Resident #32, who was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and protein-calorie malnutrition, had a care plan revised on 6/18/21 directing staff to offload his heels or use Prevalon boots when he was in bed, as he allowed. During observation on 7/9/26 at 11:22 AM, Resident #32 was found in bed without Prevalon boots in place. At 11:23 AM, an LPN stated the resident should have had his boots on, then lifted the blanket and observed the resident's legs resting on a pillow. When asked whether the resident's heels were offloaded, the LPN stated they were not and confirmed they should have been offloaded.
Failure to Care Plan Depression
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #22, who had diagnoses including Major Depressive Disorder and was documented by psychology evaluations as having recurrent, moderate depression. The resident’s evaluation notes described decreased interest in activities, persistent depressed mood, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and changes in appetite, with symptoms occurring on more than half of the days and causing moderate subjective distress. A later psychology note again documented persistent depressed mood, marked loss of interest, altered sleep patterns, and fatigue with moderate distress. The resident’s quarterly MDS dated 6/13/2026 documented an active diagnosis of depression in Section I, but the care plan did not include a focus area for depression. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated the resident had been followed by Balance Wellbeing since 12/2025, the diagnosis was entered on 5/20/2026, and depression was not included in the care plan but should be. The DON also stated the resident should be care planned for depression. The facility policy required a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident’s medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs and all services identified in the comprehensive assessment.
Incomplete Care Planning for Ordered Medications and Diabetic Footwear
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes for 3 of 4 residents reviewed. Resident #12 had diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, malnutrition, and depression, and her physician orders included Eszopiclone for insomnia, Lexapro for depression, and Mirtazapine for protein-calorie malnutrition. Although these medications were active and administered, the comprehensive care plan dated 04/23/26 did not include care planning for Eszopiclone, Lexapro, or Mirtazapine. Resident #3 had diagnoses including PTSD, depression, and stroke, with a BIMS score of 08 indicating severely impaired cognition. Her physician order dated 06/01/26 included Zolpidem Tartrate 5 mg at bedtime for insomnia, and the MDS indicated she received a hypnotic medication during the look-back period. The comprehensive care plan did not indicate Zolpidem. During interview, the MDS Coordinator stated she reviewed the records and did not see care plans for Resident #12's medications or Resident #3's Zolpidem, and said it was an oversight. Resident #2 was also identified in the deficiency statement as not being measured for diabetic shoes and diabetic insoles per physician order. The facility's policy stated that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables is developed and implemented for each resident and revised as conditions change. The DON and Administrator stated that care plans were a team effort and used to direct and guide resident care, and that if care plans were not done properly, care could be missed.
Missing Care Plan Focus Areas for Anticoagulant and Antidepressant Medication Use
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving anticoagulant medication. Resident #5 was admitted with atrial fibrillation and had a physician order for Eliquis 5 mg by mouth twice daily. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Eliquis as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as moderately cognitively impaired and receiving anticoagulant medication. However, the resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/19/26, did not include a care plan focus area for anticoagulant medication use. The facility also failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident receiving antidepressant medication. Resident #8 was admitted with insomnia and had a physician order for Trazodone 50 mg by mouth at bedtime. The June 2026 MAR showed the resident received Trazodone as ordered, and the quarterly MDS assessment coded the resident as cognitively intact and receiving antidepressant medication. The resident’s current comprehensive care plan, last reviewed on 6/18/26, did not include a care plan focus area for antidepressant medication use. In both cases, the MDS Nurse stated she was responsible for developing the care plans and identified the missing care plan areas as an oversight.
Failure to Update Fall Care Plan With Geri-Chair Intervention
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that included all of Resident #1’s fall interventions. Resident #1, a [AGE]-year-old female with dementia, osteoarthritis, and diabetes mellitus, had a quarterly MDS showing a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment, and was assessed as having falls with one fall without injury. Her comprehensive care plan identified her as being at risk for falls related to debility, advanced age, and behaviors, and included interventions such as a low bed with fall mat, tilt back wheelchair, staff education, correct positioning in chair, nonskid tape under the fall mat, use of a call light, monitoring for changes in condition, and a pommel cushion added to the chair. After Resident #1 experienced a witnessed fall from her wheelchair in the TV area, a physician order was entered for safety devices including a low bed, fall mat, and Geri-chair or tilt back wheelchair. At the time of survey observation, Resident #1 was seen in a Geri-chair in the TV area and stated she liked it and was comfortable in it. However, the care plan did not include the Geri-chair intervention. The MDS Coordinator stated she had seen Resident #1 in the Geri-chair but had not yet updated the care plan, and the DON stated whoever had the resident should have seen the order for the Geri-chair and updated the care plan.
Failure to Care Plan Hearing Impairment
Penalty
Summary
The facility failed to develop an individualized, resident-centered care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to address Resident 33’s impaired hearing. Resident 33 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, and abnormal gait and mobility, and the H&P documented a history of hard of hearing. The MDS dated 6/5/2026 indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making and had minimal difficulty hearing. During an observation and interview on 6/29/2026, Resident 33 was lying in bed and stated he could not hear the surveyor during a normal conversation, that he was hard of hearing, and that he refused to use his hearing aid. The SSD stated the resident had difficulty hearing, refused to use the hearing aid, and had no care plan initiated for impaired hearing. RN 2 later confirmed there was no care plan for the resident’s impaired hearing and that one should be in place to address the hearing impairment and refusal to use the hearing aid so staff could communicate effectively. The DON stated that a resident with impaired hearing should be care planned according to facility policy and that hearing impairment triggered on the MDS should be care planned, including refusal to use the hearing aid.
Trusted data from CMS and state health departments
Every citation, penalty and Plan of Correction is sourced from public CMS records (latest release August 26, 2026) and official state health department websites — never guesswork.
In your survey window? See what surveyors are citing.
The Survey-Prep Report maps your facility's risk from 12 months of CMS and state citation data — what's being cited around you and what to check first. $129 one-time.