Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0848
C

Failure to Ensure Neutral Arbitration Process

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 01-24-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process as required by regulations. The review of the facility's Admission Agreement packet revealed that the 'Indemnification' statement did not clearly identify itself as an arbitration agreement. Furthermore, it did not provide for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both the resident or their representative and the facility. This omission is contrary to the regulatory requirement that mandates the selection of an impartial third-party arbitrator agreed upon by both parties to resolve disputes. During an interview, the Nursing Home Administrator acknowledged that the language in the admission and financial agreement might not clearly identify the indemnification statement as an arbitration agreement. Additionally, it was confirmed that the agreement did not ensure a neutral and fair arbitration process by failing to allow both parties to agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator. This deficiency highlights the facility's non-compliance with the requirement to avoid any appearance of bias or conflict of interest in the arbitration process.

Plan Of Correction

1. No residents were affected. 2. and 3. The facility will remove the Indemnification clause from all current admission agreements. Current residents or responsible parties will be sent the updated admissions agreement. 4. New admission files will be audited by the Administrator or designee for compliance with the new admissions agreement weekly for 4 weeks. The QAPI committee will determine the need for future audits.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙