Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0847
D

Failure to Ensure Residents' Capacity for Arbitration Agreement

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 01-31-2025

Penalty

No penalty information released
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to ensure that two residents, identified as Resident R147 and Resident R151, had the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement. Resident R147 was admitted with a diagnosis of non-traumatic brain dysfunction and cognitive communication deficit, scoring a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Despite this, the resident signed the arbitration agreement shortly after admission. Similarly, Resident R151, who was admitted with altered mental status and scored a 2 on the BIMS, indicating severe cognitive impairment, also signed the arbitration agreement. Both agreements were signed by the facility's Admission Director, Employee E20. The deficiency was confirmed through a review of facility documents, resident clinical records, and staff interviews. The Director of Nursing, Employee E2, acknowledged that both residents had communication and cognitive deficits, which should have precluded them from being presented with the arbitration agreement. This failure to ensure residents' understanding of the arbitration agreement violated the regulatory requirements for entering into such agreements.

Plan Of Correction

This plan of correction is submitted to comply with federal regulations. This plan is not an admission of guilt, or wrongdoing, nor does it reflect agreement with the facts and conclusions stated in the statement of deficiencies. The facility cannot go back retroactively to correct the issue. The NHA/designee conducted a 30-day look back of new admissions to ensure residents that have signed the arbitration agreement have the capacity to understand the terms of a binding arbitration agreement. The NHA/designee educated the Admissions Director that if a resident lacks capacity, the resident cannot sign an arbitration agreement. The NHA/designee will audit new admissions arbitration agreements to ensure that the resident has the capacity to understand the agreement to sign it. Audits will be done weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly x 2 months. Results of these audits will be submitted to the quality assurance committee to determine if further action is required.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙