Stay Ahead of Compliance with Monthly Citation Updates


In your State Survey window and need a snapshot of your risks?

Survey Preparedness Report

One Time Fee
$79
  • Last 12 months of citation data in one tailored report
  • Pinpoint the tags driving penalties in facilities like yours
  • Jump to regulations and pathways used by surveyors
  • Access to your report within 2 hours of purchase
  • Easily share it with your team - no registration needed
Get Your Report Now →

Monthly citation updates straight to your inbox for ongoing preparation?

Monthly Citation Reports

$18.90 per month
  • Latest citation updates delivered monthly to your email
  • Citations organized by compliance areas
  • Shared automatically with your team, by area
  • Customizable for your state(s) of interest
  • Direct links to CMS documentation relevant parts
Learn more →

Save Hours of Work with AI-Powered Plan of Correction Writer


One-Time Fee

$49 per Plan of Correction
Volume discounts available – save up to 20%
  • Quickly search for approved POC from other facilities
  • Instant access
  • Intuitive interface
  • No recurring fees
  • Save hours of work
F0660
D

Failure in Individualized Discharge Planning

Beaver, Pennsylvania Survey Completed on 12-12-2024

Penalty

Fine: $30,537
tooltip icon
The penalty, as released by CMS, applies to the entire inspection this citation is part of, covering all citations and f-tags issued, not just this specific f-tag. For the complete original report, please refer to the 'Details' section.

Summary

The facility failed to provide individualized discharge planning for a resident, identified as Resident R1, who was admitted on 5/15/24. The resident's clinical record indicated diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and psychoactive substance abuse. The care plan noted the resident's expectation to discharge back to the community after completing the care plan, with social services to assist as necessary. However, the clinical records lacked documentation of referrals or communication with other agencies for housing after discharge and did not include interviews with the resident regarding discharge planning. This deficiency was confirmed during an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator.

Plan Of Correction

1. Resident R1 was interviewed by the social service team and IDT team members on their preference for discharge location. Resident R1 indicated they did not have a specific location they preferred at this time. In the meantime, social services indicated they would initiate the nursing home transitions program as a viable option for transition to the community, and in the event Resident R1 changed their mind, they would notify social services. 2. The Social Service Director or designee will audit resident admissions from the past 2 weeks to ensure resident discharge preference is documented on admission with a plan to follow up depending on the resident's clinical, therapeutic, and social status/ability. 3. The Administrator will re-inservice the Social Services Department to ensure resident discharge preference is documented on admission with a plan to follow up depending on the resident's clinical, therapeutic, and social status/ability. 4. The Social Services department will audit resident preference for discharge on admission for the next 2 weeks and follow up depending on the resident's clinical, therapeutic, and social status/ability. Audits will be shared with the QAPI committee to ensure continued compliance.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙